WE LOVE THE ONES THAT CAN'T

the fog is thick on the city tonight. i’m driving back from the west side of seattle and it's difficult to see even the car ahead of me save for its periodic brakelights and sometimes-highbeams as it rounds a slow corner back to wherever it will be parked for the rest of the evening. the roads are metallic white, mist resolving itself on charcoal-grey highway and bouncing sharp light up through my windshield from LED streetlamps and cars approaching; now passing. my hands are the hurt kind of cold. i hear this through paper speaker cones:

“see those headlights coming towards us;
that's someone going back
to a town they said they'd never, yeah, they swore it on their life”

 



brianna wiest wrote something again. i read it about two hours ago and i’ve read it four times since. you're going to read it in a few seconds too. it is the most concise and plainly stated piece of writing on the purpose of love that i have ever heard. not on what love is (there's plenty of writing on that) but on what it is for. what it’s supposed to do. what it will do if you let it. what it will do if you don't let it. 

“claro que si”

the following post definitely doesn’t propose an easy understanding of the reason for relationships. particularly not for the ones that end. in fact, there are parts that are so abstract compared to what most of us have been taught that bits of it border on being offensive. not what’s written but what it represents to our hearts. to our selves. it’s a peculiar thing how we process the hard stuff. and this? this post? this is the hardest way to do love. this model makes zero concessions by putting us on blast and spotlighting our shortcomings and poking right into the bruises we’ve been carrying (and covering) our whole lives. then it begs us to stop refracting and start absorbing. to strip ourselves bare, stare at ourselves in a mirror, and come to terms with the reasons we choose to love people who cannot love us back.

and then love ourselves in those same ways.

i’ll let brianna say this better than me. she absolutely does. there is not a single word that I would change about what is written below. every line and phrase of this piece is, for me, the verity of love. 

it’s tempting to throw the game and settle for something mediocre or safe. someone that would lay down and push over. that won't challenge me or stand up to me or confidently have an opinion different than mine. parts of that sound nice. i certainly wouldn't need to worry about casualties, many of which i've caused myself, some of which have been recent. but that feels like fear and this is the year to be brave. we have one month left to go. so tonight the most self-reliant, sovereign, courageous thing i can do is keep driving through the fog until i arrive. and i’m not going to be modest about this. i can’t afford to be. instead i’m white-knuckling this wheel until i turn a corner of my own. until until i’m home, where my hands will be warmer than they are right now.


The Very Important Reason Why We Choose To Love People Who Cannot Love Us Back

BY BRIANNA WIEST

The purpose of a relationship is not to be loved perfectly, or forever. It is not to have our every whim and wish met and fulfilled. It is not to be completed, or to have our minds and hearts fueled by the hormonal stimulation we think is the feeling of love. The purpose of a relationship is not the Universe’s way of saying “you’re worthy, and here’s someone to prove it.”

The purpose of a relationship is to see ourselves completely. It is to see the parts of ourselves that we are otherwise unconscious of. The purpose of a relationship is to infuriate and overjoy and destroy us, so we can see what angers us, what thrills us, and where we need to give ourselves love. The purpose of a relationship is not to fix us, or heal us, or to make us whole and happy, it is to show us where we need fixing, and what parts of us are still broken, and perhaps the most brutal of all: that nobody can do this work, or make us happy, but ourselves.

We choose to love people who cannot love us back to teach ourselves that we are, in fact, worthy of being loved back. We choose these people because they represent the parts of us that we don’t love – why else would we waste our time on people who don’t return our affection? We choose to love these people because they are the only ones with whom we share an intimate connection deep enough that it can awaken and illuminate the darkest corners of ourselves, and they are the only ones who can leave and let us do what we are here to do: resolve and actualize and heal them on our own.

It is not the nature of love that people struggle with, but what it is designed to do. Most of our turmoil simply comes from never having been told that love will keep breaking our hearts until they open, and that we will be the ones throwing ourselves in again and again.

Our life partners are the people who come after the love that opens us. Our big loves are the loves that emerge after we think we’ve lost them already. They come after we’re ready, after we’ve already cleared out the damage and debris, only after we’ve learned what it means to love ourselves. It is in this we realize that love is sharing what we already have, not relying on someone else to give us something to supplement. It is in this we realize how crucial it was to love the people who could not love us back. They were never meant to, and the rest only depends on how long it takes us to realize this.


you can find more of brianna’s work by following the direct link to this article: 
http://soulanatomy.org/the-very-important-reason-why-we-choose-to-love-people-who-cannot-love-us-back/

FAMILY | SUSTAD

there's one photo in this series that killlllllllls me. 

it's the only "formal" shot of these three standing and kim has this look on her face that is...it's too good. scot's being a dad (and a babe), holding an actual babe who is making a standard "look at how adorable i am no seriously" face and then kim is just there. half this-is-my-family on her grin and half i'm-owning-life-right-now in her eyes. it's like, what even is that? get that hand down, goodness gracious.

i won't be doing family portraits on the regular, i know that for sure. it's nowhere on the site because it's nowhere in my brain. but dear god i love that photo. even though i don't want to take photos of families as part of a business ever again, i will always love hanging out in a home with people that i love and shooting them being who they are and doing life.  

now look at one of the cutest children to never stop smiling at me ever thanks ttyl.

THE RITUAL OF A DOOR LOCKED

i have a home now. even if it’s just a for-now home, it’s a home. i’ve been there for some months and the apartment itself is just whatever but the space is actually sort of perfect. since i signed the lease i’ve had the wonderful opportunity to re-fall in love with being able to enter a room that’s mine and put my things where they go (because they do go somewhere now) and then…just be. be quiet, be loud, be a dork, be asleep. i can do whatever i want. i live there. it’s mine. it’s me.

when i get done working i can hardly even wait to turn right on boylston. my body has started adjusting to my daily routine and i’m back to passing on things like hanging out with friends and for the simple reason that i’d rather be warm and comfortable and alone. i’d rather be at home. so when i finish responding to emails and pouring over SOWs, i close my computer, wrap up my cords, pick up my bag and then get in my car to drive straight to my corner of capitol hill. it used to take me 40 minutes to find a place to park but now it only takes me about 5. i found a secret. and once i park and i walk up my steps and i enter the pin for the front door and i walk 10 feet to my lock…i’m already decompressed. this is how i used to feel and something that i was missing for like, 5 years now.

after my stuff is where it goes, i straighten my place up, i turn on a lamp or two, i light a candle or ten, i turn some music on low and i go to the kitchen to make tea and make some dinner. last night was an iceberg salad with homemade caesar and pine nuts and ahi tuna. seared, but barely. iceberg caesar salads with pine nuts and seared ahi tuna is delicious with rpmano shaved liberally over the top. tonight i’m doing the same thing with the cheese but i’m doing it over brussel sprouts and trying my hand at homemade pesto (I have pine nuts, remember!?) and using it to sauce some flatbread pizzas. i’m thinking BBQ portobellos sound good but i’m not sure if that’s a thing. i'm also not sure i should pair that with pesto.

every night i lock my door when my evening is over and i’m ready to settle in to some x-files or the latest paul thomas anderson film. every time i do, a feeling of “yeah...bring the day to an end, nate” happens and i remember that i’m at my home and that i’m initiating a curtain call in a place that feels right for right now. the antlers and the cloudy glass medicine bottles and the stacks of books and the rilke poster that i designed and printed and framed…they don’t do it. the lock does. locking the door does. it’s the act of. it’s the ritual therein. it’s the subtle click that i hear when the deadbolt moves two inches to the left after which i sigh and (sometimes) smile and stumble over to my bed. then i blow out the candles and everything goes quiet. 

it took too long. it took a toll. but my door is paying that debt back for me by reminding me for three seconds every night that i can reset. at home. 

HEADSHOTS | KIM SUSTAD

the second part and the first request. this is kim and she's one of the most imposing people in the world. she's also a giant sweetheart. rife with independence, she's 1000% my favorite person ever to hear talk about how settling down doesn't mean giving in. sometimes i bait the conversation just to hear her say all of the things.

this person is also crushing the vancouver acting scene. one night on a rainy fire escape through a bathroom window, scot said "kim has the type of personality that's like 'this thing that usually takes 10 years, i'm going to do it in 2' and she does." 

and she is.

guys, it's been SO LONG since i've done a proper portrait. available light with natural modifiers and for an application that filters in post and film-emulation won't work for. i love filters, don't get wrong. but there's something about doing a professional portrait without any studio strobes or artificial anything that reminds me what i love about this....craft. that sounds pretentious but doing work like this does make photography feel more like a skill than it does in other instances. 

here's kim.

ps, tell me she doesn't look like katie holmes in a few of these sike no don't she does just shut up.

HEADSHOTS | SCOT SUSTAD

this is scot. he's a friend and a business partner (one of our pet projects, a t-shirt company, picked up quite a bit of steam just this morning) and he's been asked by an agent to get a professional portfolio together. i mean, obviously. so here i am on the front steps doing headshots for his future model life.

i'm feeling it, friends. i wasn't expecting to, but i'm feeling it.

FORM (AND FUNCTION)

i remember when i was 18 and i was dating a girl and i was in love with the way that she stood. really that’s another way of saying that i was in so in love with her that i loved the way she stood. it was usually when she was standing toward a table or a desk and looking at a phone or sorting through mail. something small, something mundane, always facing away. she did this thing where she would put all of her weight on one leg and then put the foot that wasn’t supporting her frame on the foot that was and…that’s it. that's all it was. it was lovely. simple. and not anything anyone else would ever notice (or maybe they would, i don't know) but it was beautiful to me and it what she was doing was her and i was in love with her so i was in love with that portrait she would paint just by standing a particular way.

i remember when i was 24 and i was married to a girl and i forgot to fall in love with the way that she stood. i was working a lot. we both were. i loved her very much, but in a different way than the girl from when i was 18. i’d even say it was a better way. it was definitely a more committed way and more calculated way. a more intentional way. but i think what i just...forgot? was that i was allowed to fall in love with how she stood. or wrote. or talked. 

the thing i’m trying to say is that i will never type something like this again because i won’t be able to because it won’t happen because i will be holding out for the type of woman who inspires me to be both intentional about the context of a relationship and at the same time allowing myself get lost in the concept of her as a living, breathing, emotional, spiritual, physical being. and appreciating that in the ways that only i will be able to. 

odd, but only one of those two relationships feels as though it happened. it's the first one. i think i might know why.

i took me the better part of a decade but i've finally gotten rid of some seriously atrocious thinking that i picked up when i was a kid. it was the way i was raised; a way that i never *really* connected with. the conservative evangelical midwest has an interesting approach to anything moral or ethical. anything philosophical, really. if you were to boil it down to its least common denominator, it would sound a lot like this: "we know what we are against more than we know what we are for".  so, naturally, i learned way too much about what not to do and not nearly enough about what i should. i learned about the things i shouldn’t see and about the ways that i shouldn’t think and was given a list of things that i shouldn’t do and, my favorite, a relentless list of everything that could maybe happen if i were to consider doing any of the things that were not mentioned but could lead to them. possibly. i mean, slippery slope. #gatewaydrugz

here's are some of the things that i did not learn: i didn't learn anything about art in the context of a figure. i didn't learn anything about pleasure as a fluid part of ourselves. i didn't learn anything about the unending beauty that exists in the mind and body of a woman, or how it radiates from her because it is her. i didn't learn about the allure of the female form or how it is within me to get lost within that, or how a radius and an angle can be common to one but perceived by someone else as something to be appreciated and then responded to with admiration. 

not one person in my life between the ages of 12 and 26 could articulate to me the tension that is desire and wonderment even within a framework that allowed for it. i don't think they even knew that their framework allowed for it. my parents definitely didn't know.

fear says “that could dangerous” but love says “that’s a work of art” and somehow i figured it out at 18 and then forgot it when i was 24. i’m not bitter, but i am resentful. i resent that i had to learn on my own what the people whom i  (somewhat naively) trusted to teach me, were afraid to. i resent that but i don't blame them. they learned what they learned from someone. and so did they. and so did they.

today i know the truth. the truth is that women are unthinkably magnificent. they are intricate and delicate and provocative and dreadful and sexual and mystifying and charming and stunning and terrifying. 

they’re staggering in how they stand.

i’m 32. i hope soon to leave a note on a car on a curb before a woman gets in to drive to work that says “i was watching you write this morning and your wrist made me shake. have a good day. i’ll see you at 5:30.”

one last thing: somehow being aware of this intricacy and then sharing it is, when things are good, one of the most intimate and powerful ways to connect. but when things are not good, it can somehow become too much. it becomes trite. it becomes something to roll eyes at. that's a narrative that i'm not ok with. it doesn’t have to be too much. it doesn’t have to be dramatic. it doesn’t have to be over the top. and if you aren’t being any of those things when you deliver them, then it isn't. how it's received is what you need to pay attention to. you can tell a lot about a person by how they process you processing them. you can tell a lot by how they resolve.

i know with certainty that when i see something beautiful, it will always be my intention that you hear about it. it may be right when i see it or i may write it down in my phone so that i can write it down on a note and i can leave it on your car on your curb before you get in to drive to work.

i'm not going to be ashamed of beautiful things ever again. 

IN-SEASON HOT KNIVES

i texted a friend the other day because i needed help. i had a client (a huge one) who was upset and for reasons that were...absurd. i knew that, but i needed perspective. forest for the trees, you know? this person is a place i knew i could find that. 

i got a text back "on my way to the gym, but yes. can you email it? week is crazy but i'll write you back tomorrow PROMISE!"

i didn't really want to but i did. just that ended up being helpful. but then i got the email below back in return. it is the most in-season, you-didn't-know-you-needed-to-hear-this-but-you-do messages ever. i haven't not thought about this once since it showed up in my inbox when i read it, but barely, because i was sobbing. hot knives making clean cuts straight through my intestinal tract. 

i'm not usually on the receiving end of things like this. i feel like i give them semi-frequently but being the recipient is NOT something i'm used to. maybe that's good. 

all i know is that my friend has no idea what she said but she's right in just about every way she could be.

#brbreadingthistotmyselfinthemirrorforever

VANCOUVER SOLITUDE

i'm in vancouver. i'm here to be a real photographer again which is something i haven't done in a while. 

this weekend is the one where i rekindle that flame. i've had 8 people in the last 11 days tell me things that were related to my picking up my lost love and while i was adamant about not doing that ever again...i feel like there's something to it. i've talked around the idea now for at least a week now, but when i leave here i'll have a website done, the LLC process started and a few new sessions shot and backed up on a hard drive.

right now it's dark and i'm a mile away form everyone who is inside on the third floor of an apartment building, getting ready to eat pork tacos and drink manhattans. i'm excited back. apparently i'm an adopted uncle (again). i'm not complaining. 

right now i'm by myself. i've been walking around the west end of seattle's sister city and i've been holding my camera close and i've been stopping every five minutes or so to see what's in front of me and then shoot it that way. this is how i do it. it feels good to be back here again. not canada, but behind my camera on purpose. i'm in a coffee shop and i'm soaked but i'm warm. that's a metaphor. 

i've said this recently but photography is really important. documenting...time, is important. no one is out here "with" me right now but i'm still stopping light and creating a record of it on a CCD sensor, pushed to a memory card that will eventually be on a computer, following me for some undefined number of years until it's deleted or lost but until then, always the same as it was when the light happened. there is something insanely romantic about that. 

i don't know.

here's a little bit of what i saw, how i saw it. 
 

RIDE IT

i love dates but i don’t date a lot. 

i try, i think. and in my trying i have met some really incredible people in recent months. i’ve had zero bad experiences and because every person is unique, each one was (and still is) wonderful in their own “i am a person like no other person” sort of way. i’m lucky to have met all of them and i hope they feel the same way. i mean all of what i just wrote very much.

none of them are still happening though, and that’s why i’m writing this. i had a friend ask the other day how one of them was going. the last one. this particular person had made a pretty good impression on a few friends and one of them was my dinner date. this is the conversation that happened. 

"so, what's up with _________? how's she doing?"

and then

“oh, good i think!? i just heard from her a few nights ago and she said her promotion happened so that’s awesome!” 

and then 

“wait, are you guys still hanging out?” 

and then

“ummm, no. we’re not. she’s gorgeous and…yeah. good girl but not happening.” 

and then

“whoa, ok. so, did she ghost on you?” 

and then

“not at all. i did. i mean, i didn’t ghost. we met and had dinner and there was an in-person conversation, of course. it was my call.” 

and then

“ok, what in the world? was it bad? or what? what am i missing?” 

and then

“no, it wasn’t even kind of bad…it just wasn’t amazing.” 

and then

“ok, hold on. couldn’t youuuuu….just ride it out for a while? you are the person i would most expect to have a person around. just because, you like, enjoy that so much.” 

and then

“no. i can’t.”

listen, i’m pretty sure i could invite any of the women that i've spent dinner or drinks with in the last 2 years to a situation wherein they could be introduced to my friends and the response would be (and indeed was on some occasions) something like “yeah man, she’s really cool” or “that was a lot of fun, you guys seem really good together”. but that’s also when i know it needs to end.

no. not because of what my friends say. it actually has nothing to do with what my friends say at all. i make life decisions on my own despite my friend's opinions, although that is an absolutely crucial part of getting to know someone and letting them get to know you. so it's less about what my friends do say and much more about what i need them to be able to say. the potential has to be there. i'm defining the kind of dynamic i want. so when i see that it isn't there, i know i have to have a hard conversation. i know i'm in for another last date and i know how that's going to go. when i realize that the type of relationship i’m signing up for is the “you’re really good together” kind...i’m out. it’s over. not angrily, not out of frustration...it just needs to be done. because i’m not a “good together” type of guy. i’m not hanging out or making out or spending time with a person who “works" sort of partner. there's a qualifier and that’s not the qualifier. i know what the qualifier is.

the qualifier is “where did that person come from??????” 

the qualifier is “ok, this is way insane. it is actually crazy how perfect the two of you are with each other.”

the qualifier is “i haven’t seen you this comfortable with another person in 8 years” or “i have never seen you this comfortable with anyone” or “i’m offended because i’m your best friend and you aren’t even that comfortable with me”

the qualifier is “i’m going to be honest…it didn’t make sense at first. he/she has too many tattoos and he/she does not look like anyone i’d ever picture you with but after 30 minutes i got it. we were all talking after you left and every person in that room said the same thing, even mom and dad, we don’t know where you found this person but you guys have something that no one else in that room does.”

there are two types of relationships. there’s the “we’re good together” kind and that’s…good. but then there’s the “we’re home together” kind. and that’s the one. i cannot do a “this is pretty ok” or even a “this is great”. actually, that’s not true because i absolutely can. i am capable of it but i won’t put myself in the awful situation where five months into "we're really good together" we're both bored and despondent and ignoring the reality that we're in a relationship of convenience. you will never catch me doing something because it's better than doing another thing. i will not get stuck in a lesser-of-two-evils time-suck. 

i will, however, stay single until i meet the next person who astounds me. i will have something remarkable or i will have nothing at all. 

so why not just ride it out for a while? because why would i? because i want to distract myself from the reality that i haven't found the person who i'm at home with? because i want to look at something other than the person who would be? because real things are scary? because the bar is low so why not? because it's easy? because i don’t want to feel alone? or sad? or because i want to kiss a mouth? 

no thank you for your horrible suggestion, horrible friend.

like everyone, i have a list of qualities that i find most attractive. physical, personal, philosophical…whatever. not a physical list but it's built in so i can share those attributes with you. i can explain to you my type. i’ve dated my type recently and it wasn’t bad. i didn’t hate it. but the capacity to fall so hard that i felt foolish and silly and embarrassed was not there. it wasn’t going to be, either. the butterfly-stoamch-circus that explodes behind your abdomen when you get a text or a call or a gift or see the person walking toward you and magnetically pulls you toward them while still somehow quietly whispering the reminder that they’re wild and free that the best way to love them is to let them fly where they want and come back to rest when they want........that is a thing that transcends by a wide margin any constraint i may place on potential by way of a physical-personal-philosophical expectation. 

i’ve started thinking a lot about what kind of man i want to be when i’m 60 years old. every answer i have to that question confirms that riding out a relationship that won’t make me happy when i’m that age isn't just a waste of time, it’s working against me in present tense.